Lines
84.38 %
Functions
48.54 %
Branches
100 %
#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]
#![doc = include_str!("../README.md")]
// TODO: Stuff to add before this crate is ready....
// - Test the absolute heck out of it.
// POSSIBLY TODO:
// - Cache information across runs.
// @@ begin lint list maintained by maint/add_warning @@
#![allow(renamed_and_removed_lints)] // @@REMOVE_WHEN(ci_arti_stable)
#![allow(unknown_lints)] // @@REMOVE_WHEN(ci_arti_nightly)
#![warn(missing_docs)]
#![warn(noop_method_call)]
#![warn(unreachable_pub)]
#![warn(clippy::all)]
#![deny(clippy::await_holding_lock)]
#![deny(clippy::cargo_common_metadata)]
#![deny(clippy::cast_lossless)]
#![deny(clippy::checked_conversions)]
#![allow(clippy::cognitive_complexity)] // See arti#2556
#![deny(clippy::debug_assert_with_mut_call)]
#![deny(clippy::exhaustive_enums)]
#![deny(clippy::exhaustive_structs)]
#![deny(clippy::expl_impl_clone_on_copy)]
#![deny(clippy::fallible_impl_from)]
#![deny(clippy::implicit_clone)]
#![deny(clippy::large_stack_arrays)]
#![warn(clippy::manual_ok_or)]
#![deny(clippy::missing_docs_in_private_items)]
#![warn(clippy::needless_borrow)]
#![warn(clippy::needless_pass_by_value)]
#![warn(clippy::option_option)]
#![deny(clippy::print_stderr)]
#![deny(clippy::print_stdout)]
#![warn(clippy::rc_buffer)]
#![deny(clippy::ref_option_ref)]
#![warn(clippy::semicolon_if_nothing_returned)]
#![warn(clippy::trait_duplication_in_bounds)]
#![deny(clippy::unchecked_time_subtraction)]
#![deny(clippy::unnecessary_wraps)]
#![warn(clippy::unseparated_literal_suffix)]
#![deny(clippy::unwrap_used)]
#![deny(clippy::mod_module_files)]
#![allow(clippy::let_unit_value)] // This can reasonably be done for explicitness
#![allow(clippy::uninlined_format_args)]
#![allow(clippy::significant_drop_in_scrutinee)] // arti/-/merge_requests/588/#note_2812945
#![allow(clippy::result_large_err)] // temporary workaround for arti#587
#![allow(clippy::needless_raw_string_hashes)] // complained-about code is fine, often best
#![allow(clippy::needless_lifetimes)] // See arti#1765
#![allow(mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes)] // temporary workaround for arti#2060
#![allow(clippy::collapsible_if)] // See arti#2342
#![deny(clippy::unused_async)]
#![deny(clippy::string_slice)] // See arti#2571
#![allow(recursion_depth_exceeding_limit)] // arti#2715, rust/issues/159228
//! <!-- @@ end lint list maintained by maint/add_warning @@ -->
// This crate used to have unsafe code to interact with various libc functions.
// Nowadays we use pwd_grp, which is tested with miri.
// This #[forbid] assures us that we have removed all direct unsafe libc access.
//
// If this crate grows some other reason to want some unsafe, it is OK to remove this,
// subject to all the usual considerations when writing unsafe.
#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
mod dir;
mod disable;
mod err;
mod file_access;
mod imp;
#[cfg(all(
target_family = "unix",
not(target_os = "ios"),
not(target_os = "android"),
not(target_os = "tvos")
))]
mod user;
#[cfg(feature = "anon_home")]
pub mod anon_home;
#[cfg(test)]
pub(crate) mod testing;
pub mod walk;
#[cfg(feature = "serde")]
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use std::{
fs::DirBuilder,
path::{Path, PathBuf},
sync::Arc,
};
pub use dir::CheckedDir;
pub use disable::GLOBAL_DISABLE_VAR;
pub use err::{Error, format_access_bits};
pub use file_access::FileAccess;
/// A result type as returned by this crate
pub type Result<T> = std::result::Result<T, Error>;
pub use user::{TrustedGroup, TrustedUser};
/// Configuration for verifying that a file or directory is really "private".
///
/// By default, we mistrust everything that we can: we assume that every
/// directory on the filesystem is potentially misconfigured. This object can
/// be used to change that.
/// Once you have a working [`Mistrust`], you can call its "`check_*`" methods
/// directly, or use [`verifier()`](Mistrust::verifier) to configure a more
/// complicated check.
/// See the [crate documentation](crate) for more information.
/// # Environment variables
/// The [`Mistrust`] can be configured to consider an environment variable.
/// See [`MistrustBuilder::controlled_by_default_env_var`] and similar methods.
/// Names that seem to say "don't disable" are treated as "false". Any
/// other value is treated as "true". (That is, we err on the side of
/// assuming that if you set a disable variable, you meant to disable.)
/// If the `Mistrust` is configured to use an environment variable,
/// this environment variable typically becomes part of the application's public interface,
/// so this library commits to a stable behaviour for parsing these variables.
/// Specifically the following case-insensitive strings are considered "false":
/// "false", "no", "never", "n", "0", "".
/// Examples using the default environment variable:
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS="false"` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS=" false "` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS="NO"` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS=0` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS=` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS=" "` — checks enabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS="true"` — checks disabled
/// - `FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS="asdf"` — checks disabled
/// # TODO
/// * support more kinds of trust configuration, including more trusted users,
/// trusted groups, multiple trusted directories, etc?
#[derive(Debug, Clone, derive_builder::Builder, Eq, PartialEq)]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", builder(derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)))]
#[cfg_attr(not(feature = "serde"), builder(derive(Debug)))]
#[builder(build_fn(error = "Error"))]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", builder_struct_attr(serde(default)))]
pub struct Mistrust {
/// If the user called [`MistrustBuilder::ignore_prefix`], what did they give us?
/// (This is stored in canonical form.)
#[builder(
setter(into, strip_option),
field(build = "canonicalize_opt_prefix(&self.ignore_prefix)?")
)]
ignore_prefix: Option<PathBuf>,
/// Are we configured to disable all permission and ownership tests?
/// (This field is present in the builder only.)
#[builder(setter(custom), field(type = "Option<bool>", build = "()"))]
dangerously_trust_everyone: (),
/// Should we check the environment to decide whether to disable permission
/// and ownership tests?
#[builder(setter(custom), field(type = "Option<disable::Disable>", build = "()"))]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", builder_field_attr(serde(skip)))]
disable_by_environment: (),
/// Internal value combining `dangerously_trust_everyone` and
/// `disable_by_environment` to decide whether we're doing permissions
/// checks or not.
#[builder(setter(custom), field(build = "self.should_be_enabled()"))]
status: disable::Status,
/// What user ID do we trust by default (if any?)
setter(into),
field(type = "TrustedUser", build = "self.trust_user.get_uid()?")
trust_user: Option<u32>,
/// What group ID do we trust by default (if any?)
field(type = "TrustedGroup", build = "self.trust_group.get_gid()?")
trust_group: Option<u32>,
}
/// Compute the canonical prefix for a given path prefix.
/// The funny types here are used to please derive_builder.
#[allow(clippy::option_option)]
fn canonicalize_opt_prefix(prefix: &Option<Option<PathBuf>>) -> Result<Option<PathBuf>> {
match prefix {
Some(Some(path)) if path.as_os_str().is_empty() => Ok(None),
Some(Some(path)) => Ok(Some(
path.canonicalize()
.map_err(|e| Error::inspecting(e, path))?,
)),
_ => Ok(None),
// TODO: Permit "not found?" .
impl MistrustBuilder {
/// Configure this `Mistrust` to trust only the admin (root) user.
/// By default, both the currently running user and the root user will be
/// trusted.
/// This option disables the default group-trust behavior as well.
not(target_os = "tvos"),
pub fn trust_admin_only(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.trust_user = TrustedUser::None;
self.trust_group = TrustedGroup::None;
self
/// Configure this `Mistrust` to trust no groups at all.
/// By default, we trust the group (if any) with the same name as the
/// current user if we are currently running as a member of that group.
/// With this option set, no group is trusted, and any group-readable or
/// group-writable objects are treated the same as world-readable and
/// world-writable objects respectively.
pub fn trust_no_group_id(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
/// Configure this `Mistrust` to trust every user and every group.
/// With this option set, every file and directory is treated as having
/// valid permissions: even world-writeable files are allowed. File-type
/// checks are still performed.
/// This option is mainly useful to handle cases where you want to make
/// these checks optional, and still use [`CheckedDir`] without having to
/// implement separate code paths for the "checking on" and "checking off"
/// cases.
/// Setting this flag will supersede any value set in the environment.
pub fn dangerously_trust_everyone(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.dangerously_trust_everyone = Some(true);
/// Remove any ignored prefix, restoring this [`MistrustBuilder`] to a state
/// as if [`MistrustBuilder::ignore_prefix`] had not been called.
pub fn remove_ignored_prefix(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.ignore_prefix = Some(None);
/// Configure this [`MistrustBuilder`] to become disabled based on the
/// environment variable `var`.
/// See [`Mistrust`](Mistrust#environment-variables) for details about
/// the handling of the environment variable.
/// If `var` is not set, then we'll look at
/// `$FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS`.
pub fn controlled_by_env_var(&mut self, var: &str) -> &mut Self {
self.disable_by_environment = Some(disable::Disable::OnUserEnvVar(var.to_string()));
/// Like `controlled_by_env_var`, but do not override any previously set
/// environment settings.
/// (The `arti-client` wants this, so that it can inform a caller-supplied
/// `MistrustBuilder` about its Arti-specific env var, but only if the
/// caller has not already provided a variable of its own. Other code
/// embedding `fs-mistrust` may want it too.)
pub fn controlled_by_env_var_if_not_set(&mut self, var: &str) -> &mut Self {
if self.disable_by_environment.is_none() {
self.controlled_by_env_var(var)
} else {
/// environment variable `$FS_MISTRUST_DISABLE_PERMISSIONS_CHECKS` only,
/// This is the default.
pub fn controlled_by_default_env_var(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.disable_by_environment = Some(disable::Disable::OnGlobalEnvVar);
/// Configure this [`MistrustBuilder`] to never consult the environment to
/// see whether it should be disabled.
pub fn ignore_environment(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.disable_by_environment = Some(disable::Disable::Never);
/// Considering our settings, determine whether we should trust all users
/// (and thereby disable our permission checks.)
fn should_be_enabled(&self) -> disable::Status {
// If we've disabled checks in our configuration, then that settles it.
if self.dangerously_trust_everyone == Some(true) {
return disable::Status::DisableChecks;
// Otherwise, we use our "disable_by_environment" setting to see whether
// we should check the environment.
self.disable_by_environment
.as_ref()
.unwrap_or(&disable::Disable::default())
.should_disable_checks()
/// Fill in any values for this `MistrustBuilder` that have defaults,
/// and are not already set.
/// It is not necessary to call this method if you're just planning
/// to build a [`Mistrust`]; you only need it if you are going to
/// re-serialize the builder and you want to make the defaults explicit.
pub fn apply_defaults(&mut self) -> std::result::Result<(), void::Void> {
self.dangerously_trust_everyone.get_or_insert_default();
self.disable_by_environment.get_or_insert_default();
Ok(())
impl Default for Mistrust {
fn default() -> Self {
MistrustBuilder::default()
.build()
.expect("Could not build default")
/// An object used to perform a single check.
/// Obtained from [`Mistrust::verifier()`].
/// A `Verifier` is used when [`Mistrust::check_directory`] and
/// [`Mistrust::make_directory`] are not sufficient for your needs.
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
#[must_use]
pub struct Verifier<'a> {
/// The [`Mistrust`] that was used to create this verifier.
mistrust: &'a Mistrust,
/// Has the user called [`Verifier::permit_readable`]?
readable_okay: bool,
/// Has the user called [`Verifier::all_errors`]?
collect_multiple_errors: bool,
/// If the user called [`Verifier::require_file`] or
/// [`Verifier::require_directory`], which did they call?
enforce_type: Type,
/// If true, we want to check all the contents of this directory as well as
/// the directory itself. Requires the `walkdir` feature.
check_contents: bool,
/// A type of object that we have been told to require.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
enum Type {
/// A directory.
Dir,
/// A regular file.
File,
/// A directory or a regular file.
DirOrFile,
/// Absolutely anything at all.
Anything,
impl Mistrust {
/// Return a new [`MistrustBuilder`].
pub fn builder() -> MistrustBuilder {
/// Initialize a new default `Mistrust`.
/// By default:
/// * we will inspect all directories that are used to resolve any path that is checked.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self::default()
/// Construct a new `Mistrust` that trusts all users and all groups.
/// (In effect, this `Mistrust` will have all of its permissions checks
/// disabled, since if all users and groups are trusted, it doesn't matter
/// what the permissions on any file and directory are.)
pub fn new_dangerously_trust_everyone() -> Self {
Self::builder()
.dangerously_trust_everyone()
.expect("Could not construct a Mistrust")
/// Create a new [`Verifier`] with this configuration, to perform a single check.
pub fn verifier(&self) -> Verifier<'_> {
Verifier {
mistrust: self,
readable_okay: false,
collect_multiple_errors: false,
enforce_type: Type::DirOrFile,
check_contents: false,
/// Verify that `dir` is a directory that only trusted users can read from,
/// list the files in, or write to.
/// If it is, and we can verify that, return `Ok(())`. Otherwise, return
/// the first problem that we encountered when verifying it.
/// `m.check_directory(dir)` is equivalent to
/// `m.verifier().require_directory().check(dir)`. If you need different
/// behavior, see [`Verifier`] for more options.
pub fn check_directory<P: AsRef<Path>>(&self, dir: P) -> Result<()> {
self.verifier().require_directory().check(dir)
/// As `check_directory`, but create the directory if needed.
/// `m.verifier().make_directory(dir)`. If you need different behavior, see
/// [`Verifier`] for more options.
pub fn make_directory<P: AsRef<Path>>(&self, dir: P) -> Result<()> {
self.verifier().make_directory(dir)
/// Return true if this `Mistrust` object has been configured to trust all
/// users.
pub(crate) fn is_disabled(&self) -> bool {
self.status.disabled()
/// Create a new [`FileAccess`] for reading or writing files
/// while enforcing the rules of this `Mistrust`.
pub fn file_access(&self) -> FileAccess<'_> {
self.verifier().file_access()
impl<'a> Verifier<'a> {
/// while enforcing the rules of this `Verifier`.
pub fn file_access(self) -> FileAccess<'a> {
FileAccess::from_verifier(self)
/// Configure this `Verifier` to require that all paths it checks be
/// files (not directories).
pub fn require_file(mut self) -> Self {
self.enforce_type = Type::File;
/// directories.
pub fn require_directory(mut self) -> Self {
self.enforce_type = Type::Dir;
/// Configure this `Verifier` to allow the paths that it checks to be
/// filesystem objects of any type.
/// By default, the final path (after resolving all links) must be a
/// directory or a regular file, not (for example) a block device or a named
/// pipe.
pub fn permit_all_object_types(mut self) -> Self {
self.enforce_type = Type::Anything;
/// Configure this `Verifier` to permit the target files/directory to be
/// _readable_ by untrusted users.
/// By default, we assume that the caller wants the target file or directory
/// to be only readable or writable by trusted users. With this flag, we
/// permit the target file or directory to be readable by untrusted users,
/// but not writable.
/// (Note that we always allow the _parent directories_ of the target to be
/// readable by untrusted users, since their readability does not make the
/// target readable.)
pub fn permit_readable(mut self) -> Self {
self.readable_okay = true;
/// Tell this `Verifier` to accumulate as many errors as possible, rather
/// than stopping at the first one.
/// If a single error is found, that error will be returned. Otherwise, the
/// resulting error type will be [`Error::Multiple`].
/// # Example
/// ```
/// # use fs_mistrust::Mistrust;
/// if let Err(e) = Mistrust::new().verifier().all_errors().check("/home/gardenGnostic/.gnupg/") {
/// for error in e.errors() {
/// println!("{}", e)
/// }
pub fn all_errors(mut self) -> Self {
self.collect_multiple_errors = true;
/// Configure this verifier so that, after checking the directory, check all
/// of its contents.
/// Symlinks are not permitted; both files and directories are allowed. This
/// option implies `require_directory()`, since only a directory can have
/// contents.
/// Requires that the `walkdir` feature is enabled.
#[cfg(feature = "walkdir")]
pub fn check_content(mut self) -> Self {
self.check_contents = true;
self.require_directory()
/// Check whether the file or directory at `path` conforms to the
/// requirements of this `Verifier` and the [`Mistrust`] that created it.
pub fn check<P: AsRef<Path>>(&self, path: P) -> Result<()> {
let path = path.as_ref();
// This is the powerhouse of our verifier code:
// See the `imp` module for actual implementation logic.
let mut error_iterator = self
.check_errors(path.as_ref())
.chain(self.check_content_errors(path.as_ref()));
// Collect either the first error, or all errors.
let opt_error: Option<Error> = if self.collect_multiple_errors {
error_iterator.collect()
let next = error_iterator.next();
drop(error_iterator); // so that "canonical" is no longer borrowed.
next
if let Some(err) = opt_error {
return Err(err);
/// Check whether `path` is a valid directory, and create it if it doesn't
/// exist.
/// Returns `Ok` if the directory already existed or if it was just created,
/// and it conforms to the requirements of this `Verifier` and the
/// [`Mistrust`] that created it.
/// Return an error if:
/// * there was a permissions or ownership problem in the path or any of
/// its ancestors,
/// * there was a problem when creating the directory
/// * after creating the directory, we found that it had a permissions or
/// ownership problem.
pub fn make_directory<P: AsRef<Path>>(&mut self, path: P) -> Result<()> {
match self.clone().check(path) {
Err(Error::NotFound(_)) => {}
Err(other_error) => return Err(other_error),
Ok(()) => return Ok(()), // no error; file exists.
// Looks like we got a "not found", so we're creating the path.
let mut bld = DirBuilder::new();
#[cfg(target_family = "unix")]
{
use std::os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt;
bld.mode(0o700);
bld.recursive(true)
.create(path)
.map_err(|e| Error::CreatingDir(Arc::new(e)))?;
// We built the path! But for paranoia's sake, check it again.
self.check(path)
/// Check whether `path` is a directory conforming to the requirements of
/// this `Verifier` and the [`Mistrust`] that created it.
/// If it is, then return a new [`CheckedDir`] that can be used to securely access
/// the contents of this directory.
pub fn secure_dir<P: AsRef<Path>>(self, path: P) -> Result<CheckedDir> {
self.clone().require_directory().check(path)?;
CheckedDir::new(&self, path)
/// If successful, then return a new [`CheckedDir`] that can be used to
/// securely access the contents of this directory.
pub fn make_secure_dir<P: AsRef<Path>>(self, path: P) -> Result<CheckedDir> {
self.clone().require_directory().make_directory(path)?;
mod test {
// @@ begin test lint list maintained by maint/add_warning @@
#![allow(clippy::bool_assert_comparison)]
#![allow(clippy::clone_on_copy)]
#![allow(clippy::dbg_macro)]
#![allow(clippy::mixed_attributes_style)]
#![allow(clippy::print_stderr)]
#![allow(clippy::print_stdout)]
#![allow(clippy::single_char_pattern)]
#![allow(clippy::unwrap_used)]
#![allow(clippy::unchecked_time_subtraction)]
#![allow(clippy::useless_vec)]
#![allow(clippy::needless_pass_by_value)]
#![allow(clippy::string_slice)] // See arti#2571
//! <!-- @@ end test lint list maintained by maint/add_warning @@ -->
use super::*;
use assert_matches::assert_matches;
use testing::{Dir, MistrustOp, mistrust_build};
use testing::LinkType;
#[test]
fn simple_cases() {
let d = Dir::new();
d.dir("a/b/c");
d.dir("e/f/g");
d.chmod("a", 0o755);
d.chmod("a/b", 0o755);
d.chmod("a/b/c", 0o700);
d.chmod("e", 0o755);
d.chmod("e/f", 0o777);
d.link_rel(LinkType::Dir, "a/b/c", "d");
let m = mistrust_build(&[
MistrustOp::IgnorePrefix(d.canonical_root()),
MistrustOp::TrustNoGroupId(),
]);
// /a/b/c should be fine...
m.check_directory(d.path("a/b/c")).unwrap();
// /e/f/g should not.
let e = m.check_directory(d.path("e/f/g")).unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(e, Error::BadPermission(_, 0o777, 0o022)));
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("e/f").canonicalize().unwrap());
m.check_directory(d.path("d")).unwrap();
fn admin_only() {
use std::os::unix::prelude::MetadataExt;
d.dir("a/b");
d.chmod("a", 0o700);
d.chmod("a/b", 0o700);
if d.path("a/b").metadata().unwrap().uid() == 0 {
// Nothing to do here; we _are_ root.
return;
// With normal settings should be okay...
let m = mistrust_build(&[MistrustOp::IgnorePrefix(d.canonical_root())]);
m.check_directory(d.path("a/b")).unwrap();
// With admin_only, it'll fail.
MistrustOp::TrustAdminOnly(),
let err = m.check_directory(d.path("a/b")).unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, Error::BadOwner(_, _)));
assert_eq!(err.path().unwrap(), d.path("a").canonicalize().unwrap());
fn want_type() {
d.dir("a");
d.file("b");
d.chmod("b", 0o600);
// If we insist stuff is its own type, it works fine.
m.verifier().require_directory().check(d.path("a")).unwrap();
m.verifier().require_file().check(d.path("b")).unwrap();
// If we insist on a different type, we hit an error.
let e = m
.verifier()
.require_directory()
.check(d.path("b"))
.unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(e, Error::BadType(_)));
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("b").canonicalize().unwrap());
let e = m.verifier().require_file().check(d.path("a")).unwrap_err();
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("a").canonicalize().unwrap());
// TODO: Possibly, make sure that a special file matches neither.
fn readable_ok() {
d.file("a/b/c");
d.chmod("a", 0o750);
d.chmod("a/b", 0o750);
d.chmod("a/b/c", 0o640);
// These will fail, since the file or directory is readable.
let e = m.verifier().check(d.path("a/b")).unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(e, Error::BadPermission(..)));
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("a/b").canonicalize().unwrap());
let e = m.verifier().check(d.path("a/b/c")).unwrap_err();
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("a/b/c").canonicalize().unwrap());
// Now allow readable targets.
m.verifier().permit_readable().check(d.path("a/b")).unwrap();
m.verifier()
.permit_readable()
.check(d.path("a/b/c"))
.unwrap();
fn multiple_errors() {
// Only one error occurs, so we get that error.
.all_errors()
assert!(matches!(e, Error::NotFound(_)));
assert_eq!(1, e.errors().count());
// Introduce a second error...
d.chmod("a/b", 0o770);
assert!(matches!(e, Error::Multiple(_)));
let errs: Vec<_> = e.errors().collect();
assert_eq!(2, errs.len());
assert!(matches!(&errs[0], Error::BadPermission(..)));
assert!(matches!(&errs[1], Error::NotFound(_)));
fn sticky() {
d.chmod("a", 0o777);
// `a` is world-writable, so the first check will fail.
m.check_directory(d.path("a/b/c")).unwrap_err();
// Now `a` is world-writable _and_ sticky, so the check should succeed.
d.chmod("a", 0o777 | crate::imp::STICKY_BIT);
// Make sure we got the right definition!
#[allow(clippy::useless_conversion)]
assert_eq!(crate::imp::STICKY_BIT, u32::from(libc::S_ISVTX));
fn trust_gid() {
d.chmod("a", 0o770);
// By default, we shouldn't be accept this directory, since it is
// group-writable.
let e = m.check_directory(d.path("a/b")).unwrap_err();
// But we can make the group trusted, which will make it okay for the
// directory to be group-writable.
let gid = d.path("a/b").metadata().unwrap().gid();
MistrustOp::TrustGroup(gid),
// OTOH, if we made a _different_ group trusted, it'll fail.
MistrustOp::TrustGroup(gid ^ 1),
fn make_directory() {
// Try once with bad permissions.
let e = m.make_directory(d.path("a/b/c/d")).unwrap_err();
// Now make the permissions correct.
d.chmod("a", 0o0700);
d.chmod("a/b", 0o0700);
// Make the directory!
m.make_directory(d.path("a/b/c/d")).unwrap();
// Make sure it exists and has good permissions.
m.check_directory(d.path("a/b/c/d")).unwrap();
// Try make_directory again and make sure _that_ succeeds.
fn check_contents() {
d.file("a/b/c/d");
d.chmod("a/b/c", 0o755);
d.chmod("a/b/c/d", 0o666);
// A check should work...
// But we get an error if we check the contents.
.check_content()
.check(d.path("a/b"))
// We only expect an error on the _writable_ contents: the _readable_
// a/b/c is okay.
assert_eq!(e.path().unwrap(), d.path("a/b/c/d"));
fn trust_everyone() {
d.chmod("a/b", 0o777);
d.chmod("a/b/c", 0o777);
let m = mistrust_build(&[MistrustOp::DangerouslyTrustEveryone()]);
// This is fine.
// This isn't a directory!
let err = m.check_directory(d.path("a/b/c/d")).unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, Error::BadType(_)));
// But it _is_ a file.
.require_file()
.check(d.path("a/b/c/d"))
fn default_mistrust() {
// we can't test a mistrust without ignore_prefix, but we should make sure that we can build one.
let _m = Mistrust::default();
fn empty_path() {
assert_matches!(m.check_directory(""), Err(Error::NotFound(_)));
let m = Mistrust::default();
// TODO: Write far more tests.
// * Can there be a test for a failed readlink()? I can't see an easy way
// to provoke that without trying to make a time-of-check/time-of-use race
// condition, since we stat the link before we call readlink on it.
// * Can there be a test for a failing call to std::env::current_dir? Seems
// hard to provoke without calling set_current_dir(), which isn't good
// manners in a test.